Supreme Court Order in Subramaniam case


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Civil Appeal No(s). 8883 of 2011
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Appellant(s)
VERSUS
M.SUBRAMANIAM Respondent(s)
WITH
SLP(C) No. 23513 of 2015
AND
SLP(C) No. 3189 of 2015
AND
SLP(C) No. 17576 of 2017
O R D E R
We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
record.
We do not see any ground to interfere with the impugned
order(s). The appeal and also the special leave petitions filed by
the Union of India are accordingly dismissed.
..........................J.
(ADARSH KUMAR GOEL)
..........................J.
(UDAY UMESH LALIT)
New Delhi,
October 10, 2017.
ITEM NO.4 COURT NO.10 SECTION XII
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Civil Appeal No(s). 8883 of 2011
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Appellant(s)
VERSUS
M.SUBRAMANIAM Respondent(s)
(IA NO 6 – Applications for impleadment TO BE LISTED)
WITH SLP(C) No. 23513/2015 (XI -A)
SLP(C) No. 3189/2015 (XI -A)
SLP(C) No. 17576/2017 (XI -A)
(With Interim Relief)
Date: 10-10-2017 These appeals were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT
For Appellant(s) Ms. Pinky Annad,ASG
Mr. Ajit Kr. Sinha,Adv.
Ms. B. Sunita Rao,Adv.
Mr. Anurag,Adv.
Mr. A.K. Srivastava,Adv.
Mr. Abhinav Mukerji,Adv.
Mr. Rishabh Jain,Adv.
Ms. Kirti Dua,Adv.
Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR
Ms. Anil Katiyar, AOR
For Respondent(s) Mr. R. Venkataramani,Sr.Adv.
Mr. M. Gireesh Kumar,Adv.
Mr. Sriram P.,Adv.
Mr. Ankur S. Kulkarni, AOR
Mr. Vijay Kumar, AOR
Ms. Lakshmi N. Kaimal, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
In terms of the signed order, the appeal and the special
leave petitions are dismissed. Pending applications, if any,
shall also stand disposed of.
(MAHABIR SINGH) (PARVEEN KUMARI PASRICHA)
COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
(Signed order is placed on the file)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Draft Representation for GP 5400

Image
Dear Friends and Comrades, Some Comrades have called me and sought a draft letter for enabling them to give representations to the administration for fixation of GP 5400 in a uniform manner. Accordingly, a draft letter is given below.  The Court orders to be given as annexures are given above in the form of image files (pdf cannot be uploaded in the blog).  They may be used for representing.  The relevant pay fixation statement of individuals may be appended as Annexure C. DRAFT LETTER: From To The Commissioner of Central Excise & GST, Sir, Sub: - Refixation of pay in terms of the Order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in CA No. 8883/2011 dated 10.10.2017 - reg . *******      The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, vide their order dated 10.10.2017 in Civil Appeal No. 8883 of 2011, after hearing both sides,  dismissed the appeal filed by the Government of India against a judgement by the Hon’ble High Court of Madras dated 06.09.2010 in W.P.No. 132
Read more

Submissions on Pay Anomaly of Superintendents

Image
Dear friends and Comrades, In the meeting convened by the CBEC under the chairmanship of Member (Admn), we have projected the pay anomaly pertaining to our cadre.  While we are yet to get back the parity with DySP of CBI, we have been further overtaken by the Superintendents of Posts and Section officers in the CSS. We have also pointed out how the 7th CPC erred in stating that the V CPC found no ground to have parity between our cadres and that of the CBI.  ANNEXURE-A CHART SHOWING HISTORIC PAY PARITY OF SUPERINTENDENT CE/ CUS. & ITO OF REVENUE DEPARTMENT WITH EQUIVALENT CG OFFICERS NAME OF THE POST PAY AFTER 3 RD CPC IN RS. PAY AFTER 4 TH CPC IN RS. PAY AFTER 5 TH CPC IN RS. PAY AFTER 6 TH CPC IN RS. PAY AFTER 7 TH CPC IN RS. SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS, INCOME TAX OFFICER 650-30-740-35-810-35-880-40-1000-40-1200 2000-60-2300-75-3200-100-3500
Read more

RED SALUTES TO COM. R. CHANDRAMOULI – FOR HIS SERVICES TO THE CADRES IN CENTRAL EXCISE

Image
            On this May Day, Com. R. Chandramouli, our former All India President and present General Secretary of the Chennai unit and Core committee member of the AIB, has left the department on VRS.   His VRS was accepted and he was relieved today.                     In fact, he had tendered his VRS last year itself.   His close friends had prevailed upon him to withdraw it.   However, since he was not prepared to do so, they requested him to at least put the organization in proper shape before going ahead with his personal decision to go on VRS.                        Left to themselves, due to the pathetic manner in which the department has treated their community and exploited them, most of the Superintendents (particularly who joined as Inspectors from 1985 t0 1996) feel that it would be better to quit on VRS.   However, most of them stick on because of family commitments.   Com. Chandramouli could not be weighed down due to such considerations.                        In his lo
Read more