All India Association of Central Excise Gazetted Executive Officers (AIACEGEO)

    Dear friends and comrades, In the last blog, I had given the details of the proceedings before the Hon’ble Supreme Court on 11.04.2019 with regard to the Bharathan (Parmar) case. I have not been able to blog the details of proceedings of subsequent dates since I was at Delhi. The Department side’s affidavit, as required by the Hon’ble SC on 11.04.2018 was received by us on the evening of 16.04.2018.   Copy of the same is posted above. In the hearing on 17.04.2018 mentioned before the Court that he had filed the Affidavit. Immediately the Sr. Adv representing Sh. Ravi Malik said that he was representing the Association.   Our Advocate stated that he was representing the Association as R-8.   The Sr. Advocate representing Bharathan & others stated that she had information contrary to what was stated in the Affidavit of the Department.   The Court asked her to file affidavit on her contentions.   Matter was posted to 19.04.2018 after some discussion regarding whether it should be

    Dear friends and comrades, In the last blog, I had given the details of the proceedings before the Hon’ble Supreme Court on 11.04.2019 with regard to the Bharathan (Parmar) case. I have not been able to blog the details of proceedings of subsequent dates since I was at Delhi. The Department side’s affidavit, as required by the Hon’ble SC on 11.04.2018 was received by us on the evening of 16.04.2018.   Copy of the same is posted above. In the hearing on 17.04.2018 mentioned before the Court that he had filed the Affidavit. Immediately the Sr. Adv representing Sh. Ravi Malik said that he was representing the Association.   Our Advocate stated that he was representing the Association as R-8.   The Sr. Advocate representing Bharathan & others stated that she had information contrary to what was stated in the Affidavit of the Department.   The Court asked her to file affidavit on her contentions.   Matt

Members have contacted me from various parts of the country, particularly where Units of our Association are not functional or where the Units have taken a neutral stand, regarding the proceedings before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of N R Parmar judgment implementation. In brief, the matter came up before in Court 8 on 11.04.2018.   On 10.4.18 we have received a copy of an application made on behalf of Sh. Ravi Malik requesting the Hon’ble Court to throw out our Counter affidavit filed on behalf of the AIACEGEO and take his plea in that place.   The Court issued an order saying that since the counter against Sl. No of respondents had already been filed and NOC was not obtained, the application was being circulated.            During the hearing, the ASG stated that there was an apprehension that if the Parmar judgment is implemented with effect from 1.3.86 only, the officers who joined prior to 1986 could become juniors to those who joined in 1986.   The Hon’ble Court asked

Members have contacted me from various parts of the country, particularly where Units of our Association are not functional or where the Units have taken a neutral stand, regarding the proceedings before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of N R Parmar judgment implementation. In brief, the matter came up before in Court 8 on 11.04.2018.   On 10.4.18 we have received a copy of an application made on behalf of Sh. Ravi Malik requesting the Hon’ble Court to throw out our Counter affidavit filed on behalf of the AIACEGEO and take his plea in that place.   The Court issued an order saying that since the counter against Sl. No of respondents had already been filed and NOC was not obtained, the application was being circulated.            During the hearing, the ASG stated that there was an apprehension that if the Parmar judgment is implemented with effect from 1.3.86 only, the officers who joined prior to 1986 could become juniors to those who joined in 1986.  

Dear friends and Comrades, As we all know, the department has filed an SLP before the Hon'ble Supreme Court against the verdict of the Hon'ble High Court of Madras upholding the order of the Hon'ble CAT, Chennai, in the matter of implementation of the N.R.Parmar judgment. The AIACEGEO had impleaded in the CAT case and also approached the Hon'ble High Court for a suspension of 'Stay' granted by the Hon'ble Tribunal, 'without going into the merits of the case'. The Hon'ble High Court had granted a suspension of the stay subject to the final decision of the Hon'ble Tribunal.  The Hon'ble Tribunal disposed of the matter with a final order directing the UOI to recast the seniority lists as per the Judgment in N.R.Parmar case and quashed the seniority list not prepared as per the said judgment. The Department appealed against the order of the Hon'ble CAT before the Hon'ble High Court of Madras and thereafter went in for a review.  In bo

Dear friends and Comrades, As we all know, the department has filed an SLP before the Hon'ble Supreme Court against the verdict of the Hon'ble High Court of Madras upholding the order of the Hon'ble CAT, Chennai, in the matter of implementation of the N.R.Parmar judgment. The AIACEGEO had impleaded in the CAT case and also approached the Hon'ble High Court for a suspension of 'Stay' granted by the Hon'ble Tribunal, 'without going into the merits of the case'. The Hon'ble High Court had granted a suspension of the stay subject to the final decision of the Hon'ble Tribunal.  The Hon'ble Tribunal disposed of the matter with a final order directing the UOI to recast the seniority lists as per the Judgment in N.R.Parmar case and quashed the seniority list not prepared as per the said judgment. The Department appealed against the order of the Hon'ble CAT before the Hon'ble High Court of Madras and thereafter went in for a review.