Update on proceedings before Hon'ble SC in Bharathan case






















 
 
Dear friends and comrades,

In the last blog, I had given the details of the proceedings before the Hon’ble Supreme Court on 11.04.2019 with regard to the Bharathan (Parmar) case.

I have not been able to blog the details of proceedings of subsequent dates since I was at Delhi.

The Department side’s affidavit, as required by the Hon’ble SC on 11.04.2018 was received by us on the evening of 16.04.2018.  Copy of the same is posted above.

In the hearing on 17.04.2018 mentioned before the Court that he had filed the Affidavit. Immediately the Sr. Adv representing Sh. Ravi Malik said that he was representing the Association.  Our Advocate stated that he was representing the Association as R-8.  The Sr. Advocate representing Bharathan & others stated that she had information contrary to what was stated in the Affidavit of the Department.  The Court asked her to file affidavit on her contentions.  Matter was posted to 19.04.2018 after some discussion regarding whether it should be the very next day or Friday etc. 

On 18.04.2018 we filed our Affidavit in response to the Affidavit of the department.  Copy of the same is also posted above.

On 19.04.2018 when the Sr. Adv of Bharathan & others rose to speak and filed her Affidavit, the Sr. Adv representing Sh. Ravi Malik again stood up and said that he was representing R-8, that people were retiring without promotions, etc.  The Sr. Adv representing Bharathan & others asked him to verify the facts and stated that she was on behalf of R-1 to R-3 and not for R-8.  She then went on to state that the Affidavit of the department was wrong.  The Departmental Counsel stated that he required time to verify what had been stated in the Affidavit of Bharathan & Others.  The Hon’ble Judge asked them whether they required time and if so he said he will not be passing any interim orders then.  The Departmental Counsel sought time and accordingly it was posted for 24.04.2018.

The Affidavit filed by Sh. Rajagopal on behalf of Bharathan & others also is posted above.

Many stories have been circulating regarding to the proceedings contrary to the above facts.

I do not want to comment upon them.  Members can easily see through the games, whether played by the administration or anyone else at their behest.

Fraternally yours,

R. Manimhan,

SG, AIACEGEO

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Draft Representation for GP 5400

Image
Dear Friends and Comrades, Some Comrades have called me and sought a draft letter for enabling them to give representations to the administration for fixation of GP 5400 in a uniform manner. Accordingly, a draft letter is given below.  The Court orders to be given as annexures are given above in the form of image files (pdf cannot be uploaded in the blog).  They may be used for representing.  The relevant pay fixation statement of individuals may be appended as Annexure C. DRAFT LETTER: From To The Commissioner of Central Excise & GST, Sir, Sub: - Refixation of pay in terms of the Order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in CA No. 8883/2011 dated 10.10.2017 - reg . *******      The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, vide their order dated 10.10.2017 in Civil Appeal No. 8883 of 2011, after hearing both sides,  dismissed the appeal filed by the Government of India against a judgement by the Hon’ble High Court of Madras dated 06.09.2010 in W.P.No. 132
Read more

Submissions on Pay Anomaly of Superintendents

Image
Dear friends and Comrades, In the meeting convened by the CBEC under the chairmanship of Member (Admn), we have projected the pay anomaly pertaining to our cadre.  While we are yet to get back the parity with DySP of CBI, we have been further overtaken by the Superintendents of Posts and Section officers in the CSS. We have also pointed out how the 7th CPC erred in stating that the V CPC found no ground to have parity between our cadres and that of the CBI.  ANNEXURE-A CHART SHOWING HISTORIC PAY PARITY OF SUPERINTENDENT CE/ CUS. & ITO OF REVENUE DEPARTMENT WITH EQUIVALENT CG OFFICERS NAME OF THE POST PAY AFTER 3 RD CPC IN RS. PAY AFTER 4 TH CPC IN RS. PAY AFTER 5 TH CPC IN RS. PAY AFTER 6 TH CPC IN RS. PAY AFTER 7 TH CPC IN RS. SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS, INCOME TAX OFFICER 650-30-740-35-810-35-880-40-1000-40-1200 2000-60-2300-75-3200-100-3500
Read more

Meetings with MOS (R) and Member (Admn) by our JAC

Image
On 14 th, the JAC of Inspector based Associations in CBIC, consisting of the IRS (IDT)OA,   AIACEGOE and AICEIA, met with the Hon’ble MOS Shri. Pon Radhakrishnan and submitted a memorandum to him.   Scanned copy of the memorandum is given above.   The Minister gave a patient hearing and also asked for details of what classification of goods was, how the clash of interests could happen in the field in enforcement of the GST law uniformly etc.   He assured to take up the matter with the concerned to enable a proper policy decision in the matter. On 15 th the JAC met with the Member (Admn) Shri. S. Ramesh and submitted two memorandums.   The soft copy of both the memorandums are placed below.   The Member gave a patient hearing and also took down notes on various aspects of our demands and assured to follow up the issues speedily considering the necessity under GST implementation.   JOINT ACTION COMMITTEE OF INSPECTOR BASED ASSOCIATIONS OF CBEC [Representi
Read more