Interim order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Bharathan case




The Order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Bharathan and others is given above.

 Some members have called me and raised the following questions in this regard:

 1) Why the order refers only to the stand of the Department and not of the respondents.

 2) Why the Hon'ble Court has not gone into the veracity of the statements referred therein

 3) Why there is a sudden reference regarding promotee versus DRs when through out the proceedings, it was only regarding pre 1.3.86 and post 1.3.86

 4) Whether it is a fact that no pre 1.3.86 DR is a junior to post 1.3.86 DR

 5) Whether without the SLP being admitted, an IA is permissible to be disposed off?

 6) For such a decision on an IA, without going into the merits, why 7 hearings were required?

 7) Whether for each DPC the CBEC will go on IA?

 I do not have any reply for any of the above questions.  I am consulting our Advocate on the matter.

 R.Manimohan,
SG, AIACEGEO

Comments

  1. अमित कुमार जैन2 May 2018 at 04:32

    Good decision

    ReplyDelete
  2. अमित कुमार जैन2 May 2018 at 04:33

    SLP jaldi se jaldi decide how jaye to better hai

    ReplyDelete
  3. reji mathew2 May 2018 at 08:57

    We have infinity funds let's find some more non issues

    ReplyDelete
  4. अमित कुमार जैन26 June 2018 at 07:28

    Sir, you raise several queries in your post and last me likha hai

    "I am consulting our advocate on thematter"

    Learned Advocate ki side se kuch issue clear hua kya ?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Draft Representation for GP 5400

Image
Dear Friends and Comrades, Some Comrades have called me and sought a draft letter for enabling them to give representations to the administration for fixation of GP 5400 in a uniform manner. Accordingly, a draft letter is given below.  The Court orders to be given as annexures are given above in the form of image files (pdf cannot be uploaded in the blog).  They may be used for representing.  The relevant pay fixation statement of individuals may be appended as Annexure C. DRAFT LETTER: From To The Commissioner of Central Excise & GST, Sir, Sub: - Refixation of pay in terms of the Order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in CA No. 8883/2011 dated 10.10.2017 - reg . *******      The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, vide their order dated 10.10.2017 in Civil Appeal No. 8883 of 2011, after hearing both sides,  dismissed the appeal filed by the Government of India against a judgement by the Hon’ble High Court of Madras dated 06.09.2010 in W.P.No. 132
Read more

Submissions on Pay Anomaly of Superintendents

Image
Dear friends and Comrades, In the meeting convened by the CBEC under the chairmanship of Member (Admn), we have projected the pay anomaly pertaining to our cadre.  While we are yet to get back the parity with DySP of CBI, we have been further overtaken by the Superintendents of Posts and Section officers in the CSS. We have also pointed out how the 7th CPC erred in stating that the V CPC found no ground to have parity between our cadres and that of the CBI.  ANNEXURE-A CHART SHOWING HISTORIC PAY PARITY OF SUPERINTENDENT CE/ CUS. & ITO OF REVENUE DEPARTMENT WITH EQUIVALENT CG OFFICERS NAME OF THE POST PAY AFTER 3 RD CPC IN RS. PAY AFTER 4 TH CPC IN RS. PAY AFTER 5 TH CPC IN RS. PAY AFTER 6 TH CPC IN RS. PAY AFTER 7 TH CPC IN RS. SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS, INCOME TAX OFFICER 650-30-740-35-810-35-880-40-1000-40-1200 2000-60-2300-75-3200-100-3500
Read more

Meetings with MOS (R) and Member (Admn) by our JAC

Image
On 14 th, the JAC of Inspector based Associations in CBIC, consisting of the IRS (IDT)OA,   AIACEGOE and AICEIA, met with the Hon’ble MOS Shri. Pon Radhakrishnan and submitted a memorandum to him.   Scanned copy of the memorandum is given above.   The Minister gave a patient hearing and also asked for details of what classification of goods was, how the clash of interests could happen in the field in enforcement of the GST law uniformly etc.   He assured to take up the matter with the concerned to enable a proper policy decision in the matter. On 15 th the JAC met with the Member (Admn) Shri. S. Ramesh and submitted two memorandums.   The soft copy of both the memorandums are placed below.   The Member gave a patient hearing and also took down notes on various aspects of our demands and assured to follow up the issues speedily considering the necessity under GST implementation.   JOINT ACTION COMMITTEE OF INSPECTOR BASED ASSOCIATIONS OF CBEC [Representi
Read more