How much more shameless one can become

Dear friends and comrades,

There has been repeated assertion by the previous SG Shri. Ravi Malik that he has not issued any call for Demands Day on 28.2.2018.  That every one knows.  That he would never issue a call also every one has known.  More than us, the bosses to whom he has remained loyal also know that very well and no more assertions were required from him.  It was also evident during his last leg as the undisputed SG that he was representing the Board to the members, instead of representing to the Board what the members of the association actually felt.

The end result is that he got promoted and the proceedings are caught caged in legal wrangles, putting at stake the promotional avenues of more than 1600 persons.

In this situation, he has tried once again to distort records, proceedings and actual incidents to suit his own ends.  With this motive, he has given a chronology of events in his blog http://cengoindia.blogspot.in/2018/02/central-excise-promotee-group-officers.html regarding how the Promotee IRS Association came into being.

For the above contentions of Mr. Ravi Malik, Shri. S.K.Patil, the Organising Secretary of the IRS (IDT) OA has given the clarification as below:

"Chronology of events given is fudged for "obvious" reasons to suit 'greed' of single person who wants to stick to place. The relevant facts are as below:

1. The Daman meeting of promotee ACs was held separately in same hall(where Convention of AIACEGEO was held on 1.11.2014). Loknath ji(as SG), AK Sharma ji(as President, in absentia)& me (as Organising Secretary) a/w other promotee ACs (total 10-15) decided to form "ad-hoc' body. During proceedings of AIACEGEO's Convention when clarification was sought about continuance of promotee ACs in AIACEGEO's AIB it was clarified 'on stage'( video recording is available) that such ACs can be only members & can't hold any post in All India Body. (The cross check of AIACEGEO's minutes with video recording available, will show that minutes are fudged for obvious reasons)

2. No such meeting was held in Bhubaneswar in Dec 2014(& neither was attended by Shri.AK Sharma ji) as claimed, obviously purported by-laws claimed if any doesn't have sanctity. Rather in Dec 2014 the All India meeting was held in Mumbai NACEN & it was unanimously decided to form a separate Association as the Custom Preventive promotee ACs too are members of this Association. (The minutes of said meeting are available).

3. None of the retired officers are members of this Association. The name of Association has been resolved and adopted as IRS(IDT)OA in June 2015 meeting held at Kolkata where the then President & SG of AIACEGEO were also present a/w AK Sharma ji (President) & Loknath ji (SG) of the promotee ACs Association. In the same meeting, entire house unanimously approved formation of separate Association of promotee ACs.

4. The Association of 'retired' officers is reportedly formed by self-declared SG of said "virtual" Association by forming on 'Blog'. Each one of us in Cx fraternity has got high regards for Loknath ji (he has stayed in my house with family for a day) & hence "no comments" about his virtual Association.

5&6. The RSA Rules are available on DoPT portal. The definition of 'Temporary' post is also available on DoPT portal. As these posts of ACs are created on the "functional"&"statutory" basis these posts have been automatically get converted as "permanent" (GoI's Decision no.9 of 1978 refers) & hence the IRS(IDT)OA is valid. The process of getting it recognised is on but we the office bearers are concentrating on "results" than involving in recognition technicalities. And, we have been regularly heard by authorities in Board, RS, DoPT, DoE, MoS, FM & PMO too.

     Above is stated in nutshell. We have documentary evidences for whatever is stated herein above & not interested in propoganda through Blog(to damage close-neat fabrics of Gr-B executive fraternity).

   Thanks to All.."

From the above, people in the department can come to know how chronology of events are distorted to suit some persons.

And the more serious question that would arise is why the Board should continue to entertain such self serving persons calling themselves representatives of a cadre, procrastinating over our legitimate claim submitted with documentary evidence more than a month ago.

fraternally yours,

R. Manimohan,

Secretary General