Recent letters to Board and Revenue Secretary








Dear friends and comrades,
Recent letters sent to the Board/Revenue Secretary are scanned and given above.  The issues need no explanation.
In the meanwhile it is learnt that the former SG is (as usual) spreading some canards through his blog saying that we have informed the Board that any further DPC to the post of ACs will have to be conducted only with another permission from the Hon’ble Supreme Court. We have not made any reference to any authority regarding the DPC. We are given to understand that the former SG and a hand full of his friends are seeking money from the persons standing promoted as ACs in the last order and who are likely to be covered in the next DPC.  In this regard, the following points are reiterated, some of them at the cost of repetition:
1 1) The SLP in the Bharathan case and IA seeking permission to hold DPC for 600   posts of ACs was filed only by the CBIC.
   2) They could have very well said only numerous AC posts or even 1400 plus posts    as originally contemplated.
   3) The remaining number of posts is most probably lying vacant in the regular AC    stream and would flow down to the Temporary stream only after the DPC to    regularise the temporary ACs are conducted.
  4) We are given to understand that the UPSC had taken a stand in the case of promotion to ACs in Income Tax that DPC would be conducted only after implementation of the Parmar Judgment.
   5)  This could have been the reason for the CBIC initially proposing to fill up more posts but later specifically stating repeatedly before the Hon’ble Supreme Court that they wanted to fill up 600 posts.
  6) The former SG had absolutely no role in the proceedings before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the above SLP or the IA because his IA seeking to be permitted to file counter in the name of AIACEGEO has not been allowed by the Hon’ble Court at all.
   7) On the other hand, a reply/rejoinder to our counter affidavit has been filed by the CBIC before the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
    8) When the CBIC itself had filed an IA requesting the Court to permit them to hold an adhoc DPC until the disposal of the SLP, the former SG who is an AC himself had no requirement to seek a DPC and had no locus standi.
   9)  His entire projection as if he got the DPC conducted is a direct attack on the stature of the Board and the judiciary.
   10) Any one supporting such a propaganda is knowingly or unknowingly permitting him and his friends to collect huge money from gullible promotion starved Superintendents and perhaps also in getting postings subsequently.

There have been certain posts in some WhatsApp groups regarding unification of two factions of the AIACEGEO.  In this regard, the AIEC to meet at Bangalore will discuss and decide on the further course of action.  All our 24 Units are to participate in the said meeting.  The remaining 6 to 8 units where elected office bearers are functioning have also been invited to be Special invitees/observers and give their views, as well as to see for themselves, where the majority of the cadre is and what they feel.
  with fraternal greetings,
R. Manimohan,
Secretary General, AIACEGEO


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Draft Representation for GP 5400

Submissions on Pay Anomaly of Superintendents

Meetings with MOS (R) and Member (Admn) by our JAC